Sudan in Erdoğan’s Shadow: Are Turkey’s “Supportive” Initiatives Hiding Political Ambitions?

Amid Sudan’s escalating crisis, Turkey—under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan—has positioned itself as a key strategic partner. While Ankara presents its outreach as supportive and humanitarian, growing skepticism surrounds its true motives, with many analysts questioning whether Turkey’s deepening involvement is a bid for influence under the guise of diplomacy.

Strategic Partnership or Political Interference?

During a recent meeting in Port Sudan, Sudanese military leader Abdel Fattah al-Burhan described Turkey as a “strategic partner,” praising Turkish support in areas such as agriculture, energy, and education. Turkish President Erdoğan also offered to mediate between Sudan and the UAE, affirming his country’s commitment to Sudan’s unity and sovereignty.

However, critics argue that these overtures may be part of a broader strategy to entrench Turkish influence across the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa. Turkey’s historical interest in projects like the development of Suakin Island already hint at strategic military and economic goals beyond surface-level diplomacy.

Doubts Over Ankara’s Real Intentions

Despite the positive tone of recent interactions, many Sudanese commentators and analysts remain wary. Erdoğan’s offers of mediation and investment, while welcomed by some, are seen by others as veiled attempts to gain political leverage in a region plagued by instability. The decision by al-Burhan to award the Turkish ambassador with the prestigious “Nile Order” further raised eyebrows, with some viewing it as a signal of growing political dependence on Ankara.

A Risky Alignment?

Turkey’s growing presence in Sudan could complicate the already fragile power dynamics. While Ankara may present itself as a neutral ally, its history of interventionist foreign policy across the Middle East and Africa casts a shadow over its true role in Sudan.

Conclusion

As Turkey strengthens its foothold in Sudan through economic cooperation and diplomatic engagement, a crucial question remains: Is this renewed relationship truly in Sudan’s interest, or is it another chapter in Erdoğan’s broader geopolitical playbook? With the country teetering between war and diplomacy, the cost of choosing the wrong partners could be dangerously high.